4.28.2009

ReadWriteHealth

Borrowing from file permissions and apologies to ReadWriteWeb, we need ReadWriteHealth. Continuation from here.

Paper

Paper

A read–only (“RO”) setting, where content cannot be retasked separate from its presentation (paper).

EHR

EHR

A read–write (“RW”) setting, where content can be retasked separate from the methods of presentation.

Tethered PHR

Tethered PHR

Content may be retasked for the provider, but can't be retasked by the person (outside of the tethering context): provider is RW, person is RO.

PHR (person–centric; goal: control)

PHR

Content within an independent PHR (however derived) may be retasked by the person, RW; however, lack of access and lack of fidelity may impair provider utility.

Remix (personal–centric; goal: creation of a complete record)

Remix

Content may be retasked within a complete record where general control by person (RW) and specific control by provider/others (RW) are common goals (fidelity of records is maintained).

Remix/Action (actions might include: sensors, effectors)

Remix/Actions

With a singular personal health record, what can the complete record do, in terms of actions, that the myriad of incomplete health records couldn't do? Does this become a form of medical home? Wonder if it's not just a record, but a service?

3 comments:

  1. Hmmm--I can't see "Action" as a record construct. Even in my ED world where our 60+ monitors dump data every 60 seconds (VS, pulse ox, EtCO2, etc.) into a buffer queue, a nurse must select and receive these items into the record. Passive receipt without learned intermediary is a problem w/FDA regs--how can action take place w/o learned intermediary?
    ReplyDelete
  2. "Action" may be a record construct as a memorialization, but thinking more like active agents -- e.g., OnStar. Afferent/Efferent sensors... "Learned Intermediary" isn't a requirement, its a legal defense.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent! That is what we need, one common ground to bring all of this under one roof to make it easy for both the physician and patient, and again without losing the overall control with the patient deciding who they share the information with.

    The PHR could do this with a Portal for MDs to bring everything from data from a pedometer to a pacemaker to one portal, and provide the ability to import to an EMR.
    ReplyDelete